encountering, not knowing


Encountering, not knowing


July 2014
Written for Sarah crowEST’s project SELVEGE, ORDER, RUPTURE, West Space.



How are cuts being made, undone and amended? With – scissors and questions, with a mixture of ongoing concerns and histories, with the ever-varying surfaces of agglomerated stuff, with the rubbing of linen and skin and world, with sun and warmth and cool and shade, with infra-thin masses of digital imagery,[1] with a particular orientation and stance or a stern look, with an invitation – a pinch to respond and be responsive.



I didn’t know not knowing until recently, when I saw Meryl Streep say on YouTube that she knows less now than she did 27 years ago.[2] Years ago I would have rushed to say that it isn’t Streep that is the knower, per se, but a world of shifting (un)certainties – a world that she is perceiving, feeling, articulating parts of.



O. Right now I’m certain that I can, not know, and that in not knowing (becoming), life is full of a shifting range and mix of possibilities underway, within and beyond which the potential to become other/wise opens with sensation.[3]



I feel the need to attend to the complexities that unfurl in maneuvering away from the joy of knowing (capture) to the joy of not knowing, responsibly. Because, it is precisely in this unfurling maneuver that I find myself encountering a troubling range of extrapolations and productive contradictions.



In an interview from 1997 now published on Vimeo, Agnes Martin articulated painting as a practice of turning your back to the world.[4] Martin makes a strict cut between her work and the world. As her painting enters “the world,” Martin says her responsibility for its activity in the outer world ceases to concern her, in a practice of intentionally vacating her mind, and moving on. The responsibility comes to those who are at any moment handling and arranging the work, storing it, perceiving it. In their literal materiality these acts are profound, as they provide an expectation of individuals to act neatly (as an ethical fabric) in the various roles that Martin envisages.[5] For today’s artistic, social, ecological and political climate such an approach seems untenable – as people negotiate their direct and diffusive complicity across a range of systems.



In the not knowing of the affects of your practices out there in the world - one entrenched articulation of not knowing (ignorance) can be unfolded: the definite uncertainty that comes with an unawareness of events blocked out, unseen, going on elsewhere. This could also, more dangerously, be the choice not to confront events you’ve participated in producing.[6]



In a documentary also found on Vimeo, avant-garde dancer-choreographer Deborah Hay discussed the way she noticed the habit of orientating her dancing to an assumed and often imagined front.[7] As this awareness emerged, Hay’s relentlessly experimental practice kicked in, and she began to undo this habit by making a dance in the round, engaging infinite “fronts” by breaking free that rigid convention. Turning her back sensitively to the world only to face the world freshly.



I’m now encountering not knowing as becoming – unfurling from and producing, complexities. I see it operating with such depth in the open practices of Sarah crowEST. Moved beyond its associations with ignorance, not knowing is an activity (even a strategy) that is attentive, tumultuous and abundant – rather than an inactive lacking in any way. In this instance, knowing appears rather lacking to me, a shallow engagement, a simplifying and generalising rest from reality.[8]






[1] All so unaccountable.
[2] Meryl Streep, Barnard commencement speaker, 2010, Columbia University http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5-a8QXUAe2g.
[3] The development of my thinking here also links to presently re-reading Nietzsche’s text ‘Beyond Good and Evil.’ The quote below and the segment it is pulled from has engendered a period of experimenting with how I might unravel the complexities of a knowing/not knowing dynamic, in terms of the multifarious material-social cuts that are made in the production of artistic processes and perceptions today. I think I’m proposing to move on from the designation of not knowing (in art) as ignorance, into not knowing as an activity as far more attentive than knowing.
Friedrich Nietzsche, Beyond Good and Evil, Penguin Group, (1973) 1990, 55
‘… only on this now firm and granite base of ignorance has knowledge hitherto been able to rise up, the will to knowledge on the basis of a far more powerful will, the will to non-knowledge, to the uncertain, to the untrue! Not as its antithesis but – as its refinement!’
[4] Chuck Smith & Sono Kuwayama, Agnes Martin Interview, 1997, http://vimeo.com/7127385.
[5] I feel no urge to hold Martin’s work to this articulation. I am picking this out from a vast array of material, discussion and writings on Martin. Ultimately my use of her phrase is a tiny slither of her approach to work. I think this tiny slither is full of potential, but it also goes along a line of logic that I think needs opening and complication.
[6] Taken to its extreme this process can produce acts of great evil and injustice. It was most dramatically called to my attention recently by the film Hannah Arendt (2014), which follows Hannah Arendt’s (The Origins of Totalitarianism, 1951; The Human Condition, 1958) controversial coverage of the 1961 trial of ex-Nazi Adolf Eichmann: ‘[he] transported people to their deaths, but didn’t feel responsible for it. Once the trains were in motion his work was done.’ (quote at 39m:34s)
[7] Ellen Bromberg, Deborah Hay, not as Deborah Hay, 2012, http://vimeo.com/36519099.
Framed in terms of an audience, a mirror, an imagined, almost automatic assumption of a front to perform to.
[8] Just as I’ve attempted to reveal some of the contradictory and complex notions of not knowing here, knowing also needs to be treated with a simultaneous opening out. Knowing could be argued as a necessity for survival, I think of the knowing required to undertake the actions of the State. But it also must be considered at an interpersonal level as the entrapment of things for the sake of being certain, when certainty isn’t necessarily in the right. What I’ve been enjoying most about doing this thinking is that it is continuing to unfurl complex contradictions – pertaining to everyday actions.